Remove Leaked Photos & Videos From Mr.Skin

Mr.Skin is a long-running celebrity nude scene database that catalogues and clips performer scenes from films and TV. Some recipients pass copyright notices to public transparency databases, and a notice can carry the name of the person who sent it. We file as your authorized agent, combining copyright and right of publicity claims to pursue removal while keeping your name completely hidden.

From $499 one-time. Review your scope and exact price before checkout.

Review my removal scope

Not sure where it is posted? Run the free scan first

What Can Complicate Removal From Mr.Skin

  • Some recipients pass copyright notices to public transparency databases, and a notice can carry the name of the person who sent it.
  • Mr.Skin is a well-established US company with legal resources to push back on improperly formatted or legally weak notices.
  • Consent to a filmed scene does not authorize redistribution on third-party platforms, but Mr.Skin may treat this distinction as contested unless the notice is legally precise.
  • A valid DMCA counter-notice can lead to restoration after the statutory waiting period unless the claimant notifies the provider of a qualifying court action; it is not a deadline for the initial removal.

How We Remove Your Content

  1. We scan Mr.Skin for all pages, clips, and image captures featuring your scenes using metadata analysis. No explicit content is downloaded or stored by our systems.
  2. We file a comprehensive DMCA notice as your authorized agent, combining copyright claims with right of publicity assertions. Some recipients pass copyright notices to public transparency databases, and a notice can carry the name of the person who sent it.
  3. If Mr.Skin delays or contests the notice, we escalate to their hosting provider and CDN, file de-indexing requests with Google and Bing, and pursue state-level right of publicity enforcement where applicable.

About Mr.Skin and how removal works

Mr.Skin has operated as a celebrity nude scene database since 1999, making it one of the longest-running sites in this category. The site catalogues performer nude scenes from mainstream films, television, and streaming content, organizing them by performer name, film title, and scene type. Mr.Skin pages frequently rank on the first page of Google for "[performer name] nude" searches, making the site a significant source of unwanted exposure for performers.

As a US-based company, Mr.Skin maintains a DMCA process and responds to properly formatted takedown notices. However, the site's longevity and legal sophistication mean that improperly formatted or legally weak notices may be challenged or ignored. Mr.Skin's legal team understands the nuances of fair use arguments around scene cataloguing, making it essential that removal notices are legally precise and invoke the strongest available claims.

Some recipients pass copyright notices to public transparency databases, and a notice can carry the name of the person who sent it. For performers, this creates a permanent public record that links their legal name to specific nude scene URLs. This record is indexed by Google and can appear in search results for the performer's name, effectively amplifying the exposure that the takedown was intended to eliminate.

Some recipients pass copyright notices to public transparency databases, and a notice can carry the name of the person who sent it. IntimaShield files under our own company credentials. The performer's name never appears on any notice, in any database, or in any search result. We combine standard DMCA copyright claims with right of publicity assertions under applicable state laws. California Civil Code Section 3344, New York Civil Rights Law Sections 50-51, and Illinois Right of Publicity Act 765 ILCS 1075 all provide independent legal bases for demanding removal of a performer's likeness used without consent for commercial purposes.

Right of publicity claims are particularly powerful against Mr.Skin because they are not subject to the DMCA counter-notice process. A counter-notice can challenge a copyright claim, but it cannot override a right of publicity demand. This dual legal approach creates stronger pressure than copyright alone and eliminates the reinstatement risk inherent in pure DMCA filings.

Frequently Asked Questions

I consented to the original scene. Can I still get my clips removed from Mr.Skin?

Yes. Consent to perform a scene in a studio production does not authorize Mr.Skin to clip, catalogue, and monetize that scene on their platform. Right of publicity laws protect your control over the commercial use of your likeness regardless of whether the original scene was consensual. IntimaShield invokes both copyright and right of publicity claims for maximum legal leverage.

Will my name appear on the DMCA filing against Mr.Skin?

Not when you file through an authorized agent. Some recipients pass copyright notices to public transparency databases, and a notice can carry the name of the person who sent it. Your legal name becomes permanently searchable alongside the specific scene URLs. IntimaShield files under our own credentials, keeping your identity completely hidden from all public records.

How long does it take to remove content from Mr.Skin?

Mr.Skin is a US-based company with a functional DMCA process. Properly formatted agent-filed notices can take weeks. Google and Bing de-indexing is filed on day one and suppresses search visibility faster than host-level removal. If Mr.Skin delays, IntimaShield escalates to hosting infrastructure and pursues right of publicity enforcement.

Does Mr.Skin have the right to host clips from films I appeared in?

Mr.Skin may argue fair use for commentary or cataloguing purposes. However, right of publicity laws provide an independent legal basis for removal that is separate from copyright and not subject to fair use defenses. IntimaShield files claims under both frameworks, creating dual legal pressure that is significantly harder for Mr.Skin to contest.